9/12/2023 0 Comments Silo city private property![]() Follow him at Coloradoan Kevin Duggan on Facebook or on Twitter.Fresh Menswear for an Effortlessly Cool Spring and Summerįrom lightweight shorts to casually luxe sneakers, these signature staples will. When that will happen is anyone’s guess at this point. So the bottom line is that the City Council will make the final call on what happens to the silos. No one would be surprised if that happens. If the BRB sides with Woodward, the silos could come down immediately unless that decision is appealed to City Council. The next BRB hearing on the silos is scheduled for March 7. That decision was appealed to the City Council, which sent the issue back to the BRB to consider additional information. The BRB has already decided the silos are dangerous but not imminent hazards. The bases of the 40-foot-tall concrete structures are worn thin from years of storing silage and no maintenance. Woodward says the silos are imminently dangerous. ![]() OLD TOWN: DDA gives Uncommon apartments $700K boost However, the nonconsensual designation process would be made moot if the city’s Building Review Board, or BRB, decides the silos are imminently dangerous, as in they pose a threat to public safety and could collapse at any time. The LPC is scheduled to have a hearing on the nonconsensual designation March 9. The silos can’t be removed while that process goes on. The LPC would make a recommendation to the City Council, which would decide the landmark designation. The rare “nonconsensual” landmark designation is being pushed by local history buffs under the name Save Our Silos, which wants the silos to be stabilized and repaired. It also would take the top four feet of the silos and turn them into seating areas on a patio next to the barn, if it ever gets to take them down.īut before any of that happens, the LPC could have up to two more public hearings on the silos because a group of local residents is seeking to have them as well as the barn and a small milk house designated a historic district. Woodward has said it plans to preserve the barn, which was built in 1866, and renovate it as a conference center. ![]() So it approved the application with the condition that Woodward thoroughly document the silos and their history following a process described in federal historic preservation regulations.Īnother condition was that the company include information about the silos on interpretative signage about the Coy-Hoffman farmstead. The commission’s choices were to approve the request, approve the request with conditions, or delay a decision to gather more information. HISTORIC: Pie at heart of old Fort Collins Feeder Supply building Under city code, the commission did not have the option to deny Woodward’s request because the company met all the requirements for seeking permission to take down structures on private property that are old but not designated as local landmarks. But that doesn’t mean the silos can come down or that the LPC approves of their demolition. The city’s Landmark Preservation Commission, or LPC, last week approved Woodward’s application to demolish the 100-year-old structures, which stand next to the historic Coy-Hoffman barn. Where it will end up probably won’t be known for months. The saga of two old farm silos on Woodward Inc.’s new corporate campus in northeast Fort Collins continues. View Gallery: Woodward proposes to dismantle silos in Fort Collins
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |